|
05 March 2003
A briefing regarding the 100 tigers that Sri Racha Tiger Zoo in Thailand exported to China.
1. Background On December 25th 2002, the Sri Racha Tiger Zoo in Thailand exported 100 captive bred live tigers to Sanya Love World in China. Media reports at the time speculated that the tigers were to be bred in captivity and their meat sold in the Sanya Love World’s restaurant, as a means to underwrite the cost of breeding the tigers. Subsequently the Chinese company involved flatly denied such allegations and stressed that the import of tigers was “for non-commercial purposes”. The sale of tiger meat would be in violation of Chinese national legislation as well as non-compliance of CITES. Under CITES, live tigers can be exported if they are part of a zoo to zoo loan, exchange or donation or if they are part of scientific captive breeding programme. These transactions would be classified as “non-commercial purposes”. The CITES Secretariat has launched it’s own enquiry and is of the opinion that “the import of the tigers does not comply with the guidance on captive breeding that is contained in Resolution Conf. 5.10 (Definition of 'primarily commercial purposes').” 2. Conference Resolution 5.10 Under Conference Resolution 5.10, if the transaction were “non-commercial” the importing Party, in this case China, would need to prove that the tigers were imported for scientific purposes or for a captive breeding programme. Scientific Purposes Claims that the tigers were imported for scientific purposes would have to be supported by documentation that they had been imported by a scientist or scientific institution. The tigers could not be the resold, commercially exchanged or exhibited for economic benefit.
Captive Breeding Purposes Claims that the tigers were imported for a captive breeding programme must be supported by clear indications of how that programme will benefit the long-term conservation of the species, and again there should be no economic benefit for the private individual or shareholder. They should be part of general programmes aimed at the recovery of the species and be undertaken with the help of the Parties in whose territory the species originate.
3. Concerns with the exporting facility, Sri Racha Tiger Zoo in Thailand NGOs and captive breeding specialists have all raised concerns about the operation and purposes of Sri Racha Tiger Zoo and the many facilities like it in existence in Thailand and China. According to a Thai government statement in 1995, the owner of Sri Racha has special status under a clause in the 1960 Thai Wildlife Law to keep a large number of tigers, but “without operating as a recognised breeding centre” and he is “forbidden from trading or selling the animals he possesses”. In 1995, the owner of Sri Racha called for the law to be amended to allow trade in the tigers. The international community rejected this, but again in 2000 and 2001 various Thai politicians floated the idea (See the EIA report “Thailand’s Tiger Economy” www.eia-international.org ) There is a discrepancy between the number of tigers on show and the numbers the facility claims it breeds each year. In addition, some of the NGO concerns that the facility may be engaged in illegal trade were aroused as a result of there appearing to be only young tigers on display. Some enclosures contain more than 10 tigers, yet after the ages of 3 or 4, adult tigers no longer tolerate each other and become increasingly territorial. What, then, happens to the older tigers? The numbers simply don’t add up. Furthermore, the IUCN Captive Specialist Group does not consider the specimens at Sri Racha appropriate for participation in international tiger breeding programmes - the stock Sri Racha began with was largely from Chiang Mai, known Indian-Indochinese hybrids, though the tigers at Sri Racha today are considered primarily Bengal tigers and are publicly known as such. The CITES Senior Enforcement Officer of the Secretariat’s Legislation and Compliance Unit led the Thailand Tiger Mission in August 2002. The Mission report, presented to the 12th Conference of the Parties to CITES, highlighted a number of concerns regarding Sri Racha and facilities like it. (See CoP12 Doc.33 Annex on www.cites.org CoP12 Working Documents).
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Visit our page Visit our page Visit our blog Visit our page
|
|
|
||
|
Copyright © 1997-
The Environmental Investigation Agency All Rights Reserved
Privacy
|
Home
|
You are on the EIA–London site. Please visit the EIA–Washington site for additional information on EIA's global work.
|