| THE POLITICS OF EXTINCTION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A Future Without Forests? - The Real Value of the Forests
Indonesian forest policies have been subservient to the demands of rapacious timber and plantation industries. Policies have sought to extend the economic exploitation of forests whilst ignoring their true value as providers of a wide range of invaluable environmental, social and economic services, of which timber is only one element. Natural forests are essential in maintaining ecosystems at local, regional and global level. They provide habitat to half of the world's species, regulate climate, protect soils and water systems and provide a sustainable environment for countless millions of people. In Indonesia alone, it is estimated that around 60 million people are dependent upon forests.12 A recent study found that a hectare of intact tropical forest in Indonesia provides economic services worth up to US$6000 per annum. This figure includes the value of useful plants, insects and animals (used, for example, in medicine). Research has found that over 1200 species of medicinal plants originate from Indonesian tropical forests.13 The figure also tallies the forests' value as a global resource to counter atmospheric warming. In total, the cost of Indonesia's current plans to clear forest is around US$12 billion.14 A comparison of alternative management strategies in Bintuni Bay, Irian Jaya, found that when account was taken of the value of fish, locally used products and erosion control, the most profitable strategy was to retain the forest - this yielded US$4800 per hectare. Cutting the forest for timber yielded just US$3600 per hectare. Retaining the forests would allow continued use of the area worth US$10 million a year, providing 70% of local income and protecting fisheries worth US$25 million a year.15
Non-wood forest products (NWFP) are a significant source of revenue world-wide. The FAO estimates that over 150 NWFP are traded internationally each year.16 Hundreds of thousands of people in Indonesia have a sustainable livelihood collecting, processing and trading NWFP. Indonesia is a major supplier of products as diverse as gum rosin, rattan, bamboo and essential oils.17 Rattan, for example, is a sustainably produced crop growing naturally in forests and it is widely used in furniture-making. Around 90% of the world's rattan comes from Indonesia and 75% from Kalimantan.18 However, even these non-timber products have not escaped the interest of powerful businesses with connections to the former regime of President Suharto. Thousands of rattan collectors and rattan mat (tatami) producers have suffered, because all rattan produced in Kalimantan had to be sold - for an artificially cheap price - to ASMINDO (the Indonesian Furniture Association). Headed by former President Suharto's close friend Bob Hasan, ASMINDO imposed an export ban for semi-processed rattan products forcing the rattan to be sold exclusively to Bob Hasan and ASMINDO's rattan furniture factories in Java.22 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| next... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||