BACK TO MAIN SITE
Unfinished Business
The continued illegal trade in ozone-depleting substances and the threat posed to the Montreal Protocol phase-out

Acknowledgements  
Introduction
Ozone Layer Update
The Impacts of Ozone Depletion  
Enforcing the Phase-out
  • Case Study: Smuggling along the India and Nepal Border
  •  
  • An Overview of ODS Smuggling in Article 5 Countries
  •  
    Conclusions  
    Recommendations  
    References  
    Enforcing the Phase-out

    Illegal trade in ODS first came to light in the mid-90s, and caught enforcement agencies off guard, especially in Europe, where action against this activity has lagged behind the more concerted efforts seen in the US. The possibility of a black market was certainly not foreseen by the legislators who framed the Montreal Protocol and its early amendments. With hindsight, licensing systems should have been implemented at a much earlier stage, rather than waiting until 1997, by which time smuggling had become entrenched and around 20 000 tonnes of ODS were being traded illegally worldwide every year. This is equivalent to over 12 per cent of global ODS production at that time, although other estimates state that around 20 per cent of all ODS traded in the mid-1990s came from illegal sources(1).

    In the late 1990s, EIA uncovered sophisticated networks supplying illegal ODS mainly from Russia and China to the markets of the US and EU(1),(2). Recently there have been encouraging signs that the smuggling of ODS into the markets of the US and EU has declined. In the US the procedures for importing ODS have been tightened, and the activities of the multi-agency 'US Task Force on ODS Smuggling' have deterred many of those involved in the illicit trade, while the EU has implemented a sale and use ban for CFCs and halons, making illicit market activity easier to spot.

    Yet the US remains a lucrative market for ODS smugglers, with Europe continuing to be used as a trans-shipment point for black market CFCs. A recent case involved the movement of CFCs from the Far East through two European ports, with the declared final destination being a Caribbean island, although markings on the packaging indicate that the US was the ultimate destination(3). Last year a seizure of CFCs in Florida took place, with the contraband carrying the HARP brand name used by the British company HRP Refrigerants(4). There are also indications that despite the EU sales ban there is still an active market for these chemicals in many member states(5). EIA has received reports of refrigeration companies in Denmark discovering cylinders of CFC-12 (Dichlorodifluoromethane) falsely labelled as HCFC-22 which are smuggled in from Lithuania, Poland and Russia(6).

    An additional tool in the fight against the illegal trade has been the introduction of licensing systems for movement of ODS, introduced under the Montreal Amendment of 1997. Despite this, EIA has observed new trends in the patterns of ODS smuggling since the late 1990s, with Article 5 (developing) countries experiencing an upsurge in contraband ODS movement.

    The 1999 freeze, dictated by the Montreal Protocol phase-out schedule, required that from July of that year Article 5 countries have had to freeze their CFC consumption at a base-level set by average consumption between 1995 and 1997. Although it is only two years since the July 1999 freeze, smuggling cases are increasingly emerging in many Article 5 countries. The fear is that if this freeze can prompt ODS smuggling, it is inevitable that illegal trade will continue to proliferate as Article 5 countries progressively phase-out their consumption, particularly since a 50 per cent cut is required by 2005. As the phase-out schedule progresses, legitimate supplies will decrease and market prices will go up, offering incentives to ODS smugglers.

    next...